Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using SSDs over HDDs?

The option stating "more moving parts" is not a benefit of using SSDs over HDDs because solid-state drives (SSDs) actually have no moving parts at all. This is one of the key characteristics of SSDs that gives them various advantages in performance, reliability, and longevity compared to hard disk drives (HDDs), which contain spinning disks and moving read/write heads.

In contrast, the benefits listed in the other options highlight the advantages of SSDs. For example, SSDs provide faster read and write speeds because they use flash memory, which allows for immediate access to data without the mechanical delay associated with spinning disks. Additionally, SSDs consume less power since there is no need for motors to spin disks, making them more energy-efficient, particularly important in laptops and portable devices. Finally, SSDs have higher data density, allowing them to store more data in a smaller physical space due to the nature of flash memory technology.

Therefore, the statement about "more moving parts" is fundamentally inaccurate in the context of SSDs and does not represent any benefit when comparing them to HDDs, making it the correct choice for what is NOT a benefit of SSDs.